I want to expand on my earlier post about Phil Robertson, and more specifically, about how to think about homosexuality as a Christian. I personally believe very strongly that homosexuality it not a sin, and that the church should rejoice in two people who want to live monogamous, committed lives with another. This is a view grounded in how I view Scripture and my own use of logic and reason.
Let's think this through. Let's looks at the claim, as many LGBT people argue, that homosexuality is not a choice, but something one is born into. As Christians, we should take a loving and trusting view of others, and so if our LGBT brothers and sisters say it is just the way they are made, we have a duty to take their words at face value. So, assuming that is not a choice, thata they are born that way, then to call it a sin is to claim that God inherently created that person in sin. But as Christians, we don't believe God created sin, right? Sin is in fact a by product of our free will and choices. It inherently contradicts the nature of God to say he created someone wrapped in sin.But if you still believe it is sin, then think about this. Nobody disagrees we should welcome our LGBT friends into Christ. And we should encourage them to have an honest and healthy communion with God through reflection and prayer. So, if an LGBT person is having a honest relationship with God, and is living a live they feel is completely consistent with their faith, including being homosexual, then who are we to judge? God is the only one to judge them, and the only one they have to answer to. If, as you say, homosexuality is a sin, then lets leave it to God to work with them. Because the fact is, being gay presents no outward harm to you or I, and thus really is none of our business. As Pope Francis has said recently, "If a person is gay, and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge him?"
Instead, as Christians, we should be welcoming and loving and inclusive to all people, regardless of anything at all. And public comments like Mr. Robertson's do not do that. His comments alienate and spread hate and disgust towards human beings. That is not the example Christ taught us to live.
There are many, many verses in the Bible, both New and Old Testament, that can be used to place rules on life. Not all of them make sense in today's cultural and societal context. Head coverings for women, prohibition of eating shell fish, stoning of adulterers, ritual shunning of the mentally handicapped: all of these things are said very explicitly in the Bible, and none of them we live by today, because they are inherently impractical, ridiculous, and were put in place for a radically different time and culture. The verse regarding homosexuality should be viewed the same way. It has more to do with a Roman cultural habit of having homosexual relations with prepubescent boys, as a way of "mentoring" them. The story of Sodom and Gomorrah has to do with in-hospitality, rather than homosexuality, by Jesus' own admission. The Bible, and the verses thrown out by many to condemn homosexuality, need to be read and understood in their proper context. And, as always, everything should be evaluated through the words and actions of Jesus Christ.
For a more thorough exegesis of the Biblical passages concerning homosexuality, check out this article from Would Jesus Discriminate? It's really enlightening, and makes a really key central point to this argument: the word translated as "homosexual" in 1 Corinthians 6, is in fact a word that we aren't exactly sure what the proper translation is. Interesting that the arguments against homosexuality are based on an uninterpreted word.
No comments:
Post a Comment